Skip to content

Examples

Two complete worked reviews — one in each mode — followed by a gallery of finished lineage figures from real runs.


Topic mode: visual–cerebellar anatomy

Run from a single plain-English prompt, fully reproducible from the JSON files in the output directory.

Prompt "anatomical connections between visual system and cerebellum, primate or human, any tractography method, back to the 1970s"
Output dir visual_cerebellum/
Deliverable visual_cerebellum_bibliography.xlsx (72 rows)
Agent search batch 42 papers, 1980–2025 ( cream rows)
Cross-citation batch 30 papers, 1944–2010 ( green rows)
Verifier corrections 3 fabrications caught: one paper had hallucinated authors (Schmahmann et al. 2025 returned as "Olson et al."), one DOI was off by a digit, one PMCID was invented
Wall-clock ~7 min, no PDF acquisition

The output directory holds the full audit trail: agent_out.json (raw agent return), verify_report.json (what was caught), xref_visual_cerebellum.json (the cross-citation frequency table), xref_picks.json (the 30 picked from it), and rows.json (what the spreadsheet renders from).


Lab mode: the Gallant lab in context

Prompt "review the Gallant lab's human-imaging work in the context of the broader field"
Output dir gallant_lab/
Front end lab_corpus.py ingest → prune false-positives → derive themes & their drift
Deliverables gallant_lab_in_context_bibliography.xlsx · contextualized lineage figure · AI-authored review .docx

What a finished review article looks like

From the complexity_representation run — AI-authored prose, canonical references, embedded figure, explicit disclosure.


Each figure groups a verified corpus into theoretical families on a citation-weighted timeline, with landmark papers auto-labelled. Click any to zoom.

The HTML version is interactive

These are static exports. Each run also produces an interactive HTML figure (hover for paper details, zoom, pan) plus SVG and PDF for publication.