⬇ Download table (.xlsx)
Hover or tap a node for its full reference, summary, and DOI. Hover or tap a theme name (at the left of each row) to spotlight its lineage.
Gallant lab in context — themes across the fieldThe human program traces a progression from low/intermediate-level visual encoding and image reconstruction, through cortex-wide semantic mapping ofvision and language, to how attention/task warp those representations during active naturalistic behavior — plus the modeling toolkit that makes itLow/intermediate visualencoding and stimulusreconstructionVoxelwise receptive-field models ofearly-to-intermediate visual cortex thatpredict BOLD from images/movies and letperceived stimuli be identified orreconstructed.Semantic andscene-category maps ofvisual cortexCortex-wide voxelwise models revealcontinuous semantic spaces for objects,actions, and natural-scene categoriestiling occipito-temporal and higher visualcortex.Language and conceptualsemantic representationVoxelwise modeling of narrative speech andreading maps semantic, phonemic, andtimescale structure of language and itsamodal/conceptual organization acrosscortex.Attention andtask-driven warping ofrepresentationsSelective attention and naturalistic taskdemands shift and warp semantic andspatial tuning across visual andassociation cortex toward behaviorallyrelevant targets.Active naturalisticbehavior, navigation,and cognitive statefMRI during active tasks such as virtualnavigation and driving recoversdistributed cortical representations ofnavigation, control, and task-relatedcognitive states.Encoding-model methods,software, and frameworksStatistical methods, experimental-designtools, and open-source software thatoperationalize the voxelwiseencoding/decoding framework for humanfMRI.19551970198019901995200020052010201520202025Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 160(1), 106-154.Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 195(1), 215-243.Movshon, J. A., Thompson, I. D., & Tolhurst, D. J. (1978). Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 283(1), 53-77.Movshon, J. A., Thompson, I. D., & Tolhurst, D. J. (1978). Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 283(1), 79-99.Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. R. (1985). Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2(2), 284.Jones, J. P., & Palmer, L. A. (1987). An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 58(6), 1233-1258.Field, D. J. (1987). Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4(12), 2379.Heeger, D. J. (1992). Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 9(2), 181-197.Atick, J. J., & Redlich, A. N. (1992). What Does the Retina Know about Natural Scenes?. Neural Computation, 4(2), 196-210.DeAngelis, G. C., Ohzawa, I., & Freeman, R. D. (1993). Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69(4), 1091-1117.Engel, S. A., Rumelhart, D. E., Wandell, B. A., Lee, A. T., Glover, G. H., Chichilnisky, E.-J., & Shadlen, M. N. (1994). fMRI of human visual cortex. Nature, 369(6481), 525-525.Ruderman, D. L., & Bialek, W. (1994). Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods. Physical Review Letters, 73(6), 814-817.Field, D. J. (1994). What Is the Goal of Sensory Coding?. Neural Computation, 6(4), 559-601.Sereno, M. I., Dale, A. M., Reppas, J. B., Kwong, K. K., Belliveau, J. W., Brady, T. J., Rosen, B. R., & Tootell, R. B. H. (1995). Borders of Multiple Visual Areas in Humans Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Science, 268(5212), 889-893.Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996). Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381(6583), 607-609.Carandini, M., Heeger, D. J., & Movshon, J. A. (1997). Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(21), 8621-8644.Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1997). Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1?. Vision Research, 37(23), 3311-3325.Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1997). The “independent components” of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Research, 37(23), 3327-3338.Stanley, G. B., Li, F. F., & Dan, Y. (1999). Reconstruction of Natural Scenes from Ensemble Responses in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19(18), 8036-8042.Hegdé, J., & Van Essen, D. C. (2000). Selectivity for Complex Shapes in Primate Visual Area V2. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20(5), RC61-RC61.Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001). Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex. Science, 293(5539), 2425-2430.Pasupathy, A., & Connor, C. E. (2001). Shape Representation in Area V4: Position-Specific Tuning for Boundary Conformation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86(5), 2505-2519.Simoncelli, E. P., & Olshausen, B. A. (2001). Natural Image Statistics and Neural Representation. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 1193-1216.Cox, D. D., & Savoy, R. L. (2003). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex. NeuroImage, 19(2), 261-270.Ringach, D. L., Hawken, M. J., & Shapley, R. (2003). Dynamics of Orientation Tuning in Macaque V1: The Role of Global and Tuned Suppression. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90(1), 342-352.Kamitani, Y., & Tong, F. (2005). Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 8(5), 679-685.Haynes, J.-D., & Rees, G. (2005). Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 8(5), 686-691.Thirion, B., Duchesnay, E., Hubbard, E., Dubois, J., Poline, J.-B., Lebihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2006). Inverse retinotopy: Inferring the visual content of images from brain activation patterns. NeuroImage, 33(4), 1104-1116.Dumoulin, S. O., & Wandell, B. A. (2008). Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex. NeuroImage, 39(2), 647-660.Miyawaki, Y., Uchida, H., Yamashita, O., Sato, M.-A., Morito, Y., Tanabe, H. C., Sadato, N., & Kamitani, Y. (2008). Visual Image Reconstruction from Human Brain Activity using a Combination of Multiscale Local Image Decoders. Neuron, 60(5), 915-929.Geisler, W. S. (2008). Visual Perception and the Statistical Properties of Natural Scenes. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 167-192.Wandell, B. A., & Winawer, J. (2011). Imaging retinotopic maps in the human brain. Vision Research, 51(7), 718-737.Tong, F., & Pratte, M. S. (2012). Decoding Patterns of Human Brain Activity. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 483-509.Carandini, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2012). Normalization as a canonical neural computation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(1), 51-62.Guclu, U., & van Gerven, M. A. J. (2015). Deep Neural Networks Reveal a Gradient in the Complexity of Neural Representations across the Ventral Stream. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(27), 10005-10014.Cichy, R. M., Khosla, A., Pantazis, D., Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2016). Comparison of deep neural networks to spatio-temporal cortical dynamics of human visual object recognition reveals hierarchical correspondence. Scientific Reports, 6(1).Güçlü, U., & van Gerven, M. A. J. (2017). Increasingly complex representations of natural movies across the dorsal stream are shared between subjects. NeuroImage, 145, 329-336.Eickenberg, M., Gramfort, A., Varoquaux, G., & Thirion, B. (2017). Seeing it all: Convolutional network layers map the function of the human visual system. NeuroImage, 152, 184-194.Horikawa, T., & Kamitani, Y. (2017). Generic decoding of seen and imagined objects using hierarchical visual features. Nature Communications, 8(1).Wen, H., Shi, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, K.-H., Cao, J., & Liu, Z. (2018). Neural Encoding and Decoding with Deep Learning for Dynamic Natural Vision. Cerebral Cortex, 28(12), 4136-4160.Shen, G., Horikawa, T., Majima, K., & Kamitani, Y. (2019). Deep image reconstruction from human brain activity. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(1), e1006633.Mozafari, M., Reddy, L., & VanRullen, R. (2020). Reconstructing Natural Scenes from fMRI Patterns using BigBiGAN. 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.Ozcelik, F., Choksi, B., Mozafari, M., Reddy, L., & VanRullen, R. (2022). Reconstruction of Perceived Images from fMRI Patterns and Semantic Brain Exploration using Instance-Conditioned GANs. 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.Lin, S., Sprague, T., & Singh, A. K. (2022). Mind Reader: Reconstructing complex images from brain activities. arXiv.Takagi, Y., & Nishimoto, S. (2023). High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity. 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Chen, Z., Qing, J., Xiang, T., Yue, W. L., & Zhou, J. H. (2023). Seeing Beyond the Brain: Conditional Diffusion Model with Sparse Masked Modeling for Vision Decoding. 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Ozcelik, F., & VanRullen, R. (2023). Natural scene reconstruction from fMRI signals using generative latent diffusion. Scientific Reports, 13(1).Scotti, P. S., Banerjee, A., Goode, J., Shabalin, S., Nguyen, A., Cohen, E., Dempster, A. J., Verlinde, N., Yundler, E., Weisberg, D., Norman, K. A., & Abraham, T. M. (2023). Reconstructing the Mind's Eye: fMRI-to-Image with Contrastive Learning and Diffusion Priors. arXiv.Chen, Z., Qing, J., & Zhou, J. H. (2023). Cinematic Mindscapes: High-quality Video Reconstruction from Brain Activity. arXiv.Benchetrit, Y., Banville, H., & King, J.-R. (2023). Brain decoding: toward real-time reconstruction of visual perception. arXiv.Scotti, P. S., Tripathy, M., Villanueva, C. K. T., Kneeland, R., Chen, T., Narang, A., Santhirasegaran, C., Xu, J., Naselaris, T., Norman, K. A., & Abraham, T. M. (2024). MindEye2: Shared-Subject Models Enable fMRI-To-Image With 1 Hour of Data. arXiv.Kim, I., Kupers, E. R., Lerma-Usabiaga, G., & Grill-Spector, K. (2024). Characterizing Spatiotemporal Population Receptive Fields in Human Visual Cortex with fMRI. The Journal of Neuroscience, 44(2), e0803232023.da Costa, D., Kornemann, L., Goebel, R., & Senden, M. (2024). Convolutional neural networks develop major organizational principles of early visual cortex when enhanced with retinal sampling. Scientific Reports, 14(1).Gong, Z., Bao, G., Zhang, Q., Wan, Z., Miao, D., Wang, S., Zhu, L., Wang, C., Xu, R., Hu, L., Liu, K., & Zhang, Y. (2024). NeuroClips: Towards High-fidelity and Smooth fMRI-to-Video Reconstruction. arXiv.Wang, S., Liu, S., Tan, Z., & Wang, X. (2024). MindBridge: A Cross-Subject Brain Decoding Framework. arXiv.Caselles-Dupré, H., Mellerio, C., Hérent, P., Lopez-Persem, A., Béranger, B., Soularue, M., Fautrel, P., Vernier, G., & Cord, M. (2024). Mind-to-Image: Projecting Visual Mental Imagination of the Brain from fMRI. arXiv.Careil, M., Benchetrit, Y., & King, J.-R. (2025). Dynadiff: Single-stage Decoding of Images from Continuously Evolving fMRI. arXiv.Beliy, R., Zalcher, A., Kogman, J., Wasserman, N., & Irani, M. (2025). Brain-IT: Image Reconstruction from fMRI via Brain-Interaction Transformer. arXiv.Dai, Y., Yao, Z., Song, C., Zheng, Q., Mai, W., Peng, K., Lu, S., Ouyang, W., Yang, J., & Wu, J. (2025). MindAligner: Explicit Brain Functional Alignment for Cross-Subject Visual Decoding from Limited fMRI Data. arXiv.Desimone, R., Albright, T., Gross, C., & Bruce, C. (1984). Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque. The Journal of Neuroscience, 4(8), 2051-2062.Malach, R., Reppas, J. B., Benson, R. R., Kwong, K. K., Jiang, H., Kennedy, W. A., Ledden, P. J., Brady, T. J., Rosen, B. R., & Tootell, R. B. (1995). Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92(18), 8135-8139.Tanaka, K. (1996). Inferotemporal Cortex and Object Vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19(1), 109-139.Logothetis, N. K., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). Visual Object Recognition. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19(1), 577-621.Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302-4311.Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392(6676), 598-601.Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). A Cortical Area Selective for Visual Processing of the Human Body. Science, 293(5539), 2470-2473.Hung, C. P., Kreiman, G., Poggio, T., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2005). Fast Readout of Object Identity from Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex. Science, 310(5749), 863-866.Quiroga, R. Q., Reddy, L., Kreiman, G., Koch, C., & Fried, I. (2005). Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain. Nature, 435(7045), 1102-1107.Tsao, D. Y., Freiwald, W. A., Tootell, R. B. H., & Livingstone, M. S. (2006). A Cortical Region Consisting Entirely of Face-Selective Cells. Science, 311(5761), 670-674.Kriegeskorte, N., Mur, M., Ruff, D. A., Kiani, R., Bodurka, J., Esteky, H., Tanaka, K., & Bandettini, P. A. (2008). Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey. Neuron, 60(6), 1126-1141.Walther, D. B., Caddigan, E., Fei-Fei, L., & Beck, D. M. (2009). Natural Scene Categories Revealed in Distributed Patterns of Activity in the Human Brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(34), 10573-10581.Greene, M., & Oliva, A. (2009). Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cognitive Psychology, 58(2), 137-176.Konkle, T., & Oliva, A. (2012). A Real-World Size Organization of Object Responses in Occipitotemporal Cortex. Neuron, 74(6), 1114-1124.Connolly, A. C., Guntupalli, J. S., Gors, J., Hanke, M., Halchenko, Y. O., Wu, Y.-C., Abdi, H., & Haxby, J. V. (2012). The Representation of Biological Classes in the Human Brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(8), 2608-2618.Konkle, T., & Caramazza, A. (2013). Tripartite Organization of the Ventral Stream by Animacy and Object Size. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(25), 10235-10242.Carlson, T., Tovar, D. A., Alink, A., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2013). Representational dynamics of object vision: The first 1000 ms. Journal of Vision, 13(10), 1-1.Dilks, D. D., Julian, J. B., Paunov, A. M., & Kanwisher, N. (2013). The Occipital Place Area Is Causally and Selectively Involved in Scene Perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(4), 1331-1336.Grill-Spector, K., & Weiner, K. S. (2014). The functional architecture of the ventral temporal cortex and its role in categorization. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(8), 536-548.Cichy, R. M., Pantazis, D., & Oliva, A. (2014). Resolving human object recognition in space and time. Nature Neuroscience, 17(3), 455-462.Khaligh-Razavi, S.-M., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2014). Deep Supervised, but Not Unsupervised, Models May Explain IT Cortical Representation. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(11), e1003915.Bracci, S., & Op de Beeck, H. (2016). Dissociations and Associations between Shape and Category Representations in the Two Visual Pathways. The Journal of Neuroscience, 36(2), 432-444.Bonner, M. F., & Epstein, R. A. (2017). Coding of navigational affordances in the human visual system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(18), 4793-4798.Peelen, M. V., & Downing, P. E. (2017). Category selectivity in human visual cortex: Beyond visual object recognition. Neuropsychologia, 105, 177-183.Groen, I. I. A., Silson, E. H., & Baker, C. I. (2017). Contributions of low- and high-level properties to neural processing of visual scenes in the human brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1714), 20160102.Thorat, S., Proklova, D., & Peelen, M. V. (2019). The nature of the animacy organization in human ventral temporal cortex. eLife, 8.Epstein, R. A., & Baker, C. I. (2019). Scene Perception in the Human Brain. Annual Review of Vision Science, 5(1), 373-397.Hebart, M. N., Zheng, C. Y., Pereira, F., & Baker, C. I. (2020). Revealing the multidimensional mental representations of natural objects underlying human similarity judgements. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1173-1185.Khosla, M., Ratan Murty, N. A., & Kanwisher, N. (2022). A highly selective response to food in human visual cortex revealed by hypothesis-free voxel decomposition. Current Biology, 32(19), 4159-4171.e9.Wang, A. Y., Kay, K., Naselaris, T., Tarr, M. J., & Wehbe, L. (2023). Better models of human high-level visual cortex emerge from natural language supervision with a large and diverse dataset. Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(12), 1415-1426.Doshi, F. R., & Konkle, T. (2023). Cortical topographic motifs emerge in a self-organized map of object space. Science Advances, 9(25).Conwell, C., Prince, J. S., Kay, K. N., Alvarez, G. A., & Konkle, T. (2024). A large-scale examination of inductive biases shaping high-level visual representation in brains and machines. Nature Communications, 15(1).Contier, O., Baker, C. I., & Hebart, M. N. (2024). Distributed representations of behaviour-derived object dimensions in the human visual system. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(11), 2179-2193.Prince, J. S., Alvarez, G. A., & Konkle, T. (2024). Contrastive learning explains the emergence and function of visual category-selective regions. Science Advances, 10(39).Margalit, E., Lee, H., Finzi, D., DiCarlo, J. J., Grill-Spector, K., & Yamins, D. L. K. (2024). A unifying framework for functional organization in early and higher ventral visual cortex. Neuron, 112(14), 2435-2451.e7.Li, J., Hiersche, K. J., & Saygin, Z. M. (2024). Demystifying visual word form area visual and nonvisual response properties with precision fMRI. iScience, 27(12), 111481.Doerig, A., Kietzmann, T. C., Allen, E., Wu, Y., Naselaris, T., Kay, K., & Charest, I. (2025). High-level visual representations in the human brain are aligned with large language models. Nature Machine Intelligence, 7(8), 1220-1234.Cortinovis, D., Truong, N., Op de Beeck, H., & Bracci, S. (2025). Investigating action topography in visual cortex and deep artificial neural networks. Nature Communications, 17(1).Mahner, F. P., Muttenthaler, L., Güçlü, U., & Hebart, M. N. (2025). Dimensions underlying the representational alignment of deep neural networks with humans. Nature Machine Intelligence, 7(6), 848-859.Du, C., Fu, K., Wen, B., Sun, Y., Peng, J., Wei, W., Gao, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, C., Li, J., Qiu, S., Chang, L., & He, H. (2025). Human-like object concept representations emerge naturally in multimodal large language models. Nature Machine Intelligence, 7(6), 860-875.Henderson, M. M., Tarr, M. J., & Wehbe, L. (2025). Origins of food selectivity in human visual cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 48(2), 113-123.Theunissen, F. E., Sen, K., & Doupe, A. J. (2000). Spectral-Temporal Receptive Fields of Nonlinear Auditory Neurons Obtained Using Natural Sounds. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20(6), 2315-2331.Mitchell, T. M., Shinkareva, S. V., Carlson, A., Chang, K.-M., Malave, V. L., Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2008). Predicting Human Brain Activity Associated with the Meanings of Nouns. Science, 320(5880), 1191-1195.Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where Is the Semantic System? A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of 120 Functional Neuroimaging Studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2767-2796.Lerner, Y., Honey, C. J., Silbert, L. J., & Hasson, U. (2011). Topographic Mapping of a Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows Using a Narrated Story. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(8), 2906-2915.Fedorenko, E., Behr, M. K., & Kanwisher, N. (2011). Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(39), 16428-16433.Price, C. J. (2012). A review and synthesis of the first 20years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. NeuroImage, 62(2), 816-847.Mesgarani, N., Cheung, C., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F. (2014). Phonetic Feature Encoding in Human Superior Temporal Gyrus. Science, 343(6174), 1006-1010.Wehbe, L., Murphy, B., Talukdar, P., Fyshe, A., Ramdas, A., & Mitchell, T. (2014). Simultaneously Uncovering the Patterns of Brain Regions Involved in Different Story Reading Subprocesses. PLoS ONE, 9(11), e112575.Wehbe, L., Vaswani, A., Knight, K., & Mitchell, T. (2014). Aligning context-based statistical models of language with brain activity during reading. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.Pereira, F., Lou, B., Pritchett, B., Ritter, S., Gershman, S. J., Kanwisher, N., Botvinick, M., & Fedorenko, E. (2018). Toward a universal decoder of linguistic meaning from brain activation. Nature Communications, 9(1).Jain, S., & Huth, A. G. (2018). Incorporating Context into Language Encoding Models for fMRI. bioRxiv.Toneva, M., & Wehbe, L. (2019). Interpreting and improving natural-language processing (in machines) with natural language-processing (in the brain). arXiv.Schwartz, D., Toneva, M., & Wehbe, L. (2019). Inducing brain-relevant bias in natural language processing models. arXiv.Hasson, U., Nastase, S. A., & Goldstein, A. (2020). Direct Fit to Nature: An Evolutionary Perspective on Biological and Artificial Neural Networks. Neuron, 105(3), 416-434.Jain, S., Mahto, S., Turek, J. S., Vo, V. A., LeBel, A., & Huth, A. G. (2020). Interpretable multi-timescale models for predicting fMRI responses to continuous natural speech. bioRxiv.Schrimpf, M., Blank, I. A., Tuckute, G., Kauf, C., Hosseini, E. A., Kanwisher, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Fedorenko, E. (2021). The neural architecture of language: Integrative modeling converges on predictive processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(45).Caucheteux, C., Gramfort, A., & King, J.-R. (2021). Disentangling Syntax and Semantics in the Brain with Deep Networks. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2021.Hamilton, L. S., Oganian, Y., Hall, J., & Chang, E. F. (2021). Parallel and distributed encoding of speech across human auditory cortex. Cell, 184(18), 4626-4639.e13.Anderson, A. J., Kiela, D., Binder, J. R., Fernandino, L., Humphries, C. J., Conant, L. L., Raizada, R. D. S., Grimm, S., & Lalor, E. C. (2021). Deep Artificial Neural Networks Reveal a Distributed Cortical Network Encoding Propositional Sentence-Level Meaning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 41(18), 4100-4119.Goldstein, A., Zada, Z., Buchnik, E., Schain, M., Price, A., Aubrey, B., Nastase, S. A., Feder, A., Emanuel, D., Cohen, A., Jansen, A., Gazula, H., Choe, G., Rao, A., Kim, C., Casto, C., Fanda, L., Doyle, W., Friedman, D., … Hasson, U. (2022). Shared computational principles for language processing in humans and deep language models. Nature Neuroscience, 25(3), 369-380.Caucheteux, C., & King, J.-R. (2022). Brains and algorithms partially converge in natural language processing. Communications Biology, 5(1).Caucheteux, C., Gramfort, A., & King, J.-R. (2022). Deep language algorithms predict semantic comprehension from brain activity. Scientific Reports, 12(1).Heilbron, M., Armeni, K., Schoffelen, J.-M., Hagoort, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2022). A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(32).Vaidya, A. R., Jain, S., & Huth, A. G. (2022). Self-supervised models of audio effectively explain human cortical responses to speech. arXiv.Pasquiou, A., Lakretz, Y., Thirion, B., & Pallier, C. (2023). Information-Restricted Neural Language Models Reveal Different Brain Regions’ Sensitivity to Semantics, Syntax, and Context. Neurobiology of Language, 4(4), 611-636.Tang, J., LeBel, A., Jain, S., & Huth, A. G. (2023). Semantic reconstruction of continuous language from non-invasive brain recordings. Nature Neuroscience, 26(5), 858-866.Caucheteux, C., Gramfort, A., & King, J.-R. (2023). Evidence of a predictive coding hierarchy in the human brain listening to speech. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(3), 430-441.Antonello, R., Vaidya, A., & Huth, A. G. (2023). Scaling laws for language encoding models in fMRI. arXiv.Antonello, R., & Huth, A. (2023). Predictive Coding or Just Feature Discovery? An Alternative Account of Why Language Models Fit Brain Data. Neurobiology of Language.Tang, J., Du, M., Vo, V. A., Lal, V., & Huth, A. G. (2023). Brain encoding models based on multimodal transformers can transfer across language and vision. arXiv.Oota, S. R., Chen, Z., Gupta, M., Bapi, R. S., Jobard, G., Alexandre, F., & Hinaut, X. (2023). Deep Neural Networks and Brain Alignment: Brain Encoding and Decoding (Survey). Published in Transactions on Machine Learning Research.Tuckute, G., Sathe, A., Srikant, S., Taliaferro, M., Wang, M., Schrimpf, M., Kay, K., & Fedorenko, E. (2024). Driving and suppressing the human language network using large language models. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(3), 544-561.Kumar, S., Sumers, T. R., Yamakoshi, T., Goldstein, A., Hasson, U., Norman, K. A., Griffiths, T. L., Hawkins, R. D., & Nastase, S. A. (2024). Shared functional specialization in transformer-based language models and the human brain. Nature Communications, 15(1).Fedorenko, E., Ivanova, A. A., & Regev, T. I. (2024). The language network as a natural kind within the broader landscape of the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 25(5), 289-312.Fedorenko, E., Piantadosi, S. T., & Gibson, E. A. F. (2024). Language is primarily a tool for communication rather than thought. Nature, 630(8017), 575-586.Tuckute, G., Kanwisher, N., & Fedorenko, E. (2024). Language in Brains, Minds, and Machines. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 47(1), 277-301.Zada, Z., Goldstein, A., Michelmann, S., Simony, E., Price, A., Hasenfratz, L., Barham, E., Zadbood, A., Doyle, W., Friedman, D., Dugan, P., Melloni, L., Devore, S., Flinker, A., Devinsky, O., Nastase, S. A., & Hasson, U. (2024). A shared model-based linguistic space for transmitting our thoughts from brain to brain in natural conversations. Neuron, 112(18), 3211-3222.e5.Hong, Z., Wang, H., Zada, Z., Gazula, H., Turner, D., Aubrey, B., Niekerken, L., Doyle, W., Devore, S., Dugan, P., Friedman, D., Devinsky, O., Flinker, A., Hasson, U., Nastase, S. A., & Goldstein, A. (2024). Scale matters: Large language models with billions (rather than millions) of parameters better match neural representations of natural language. bioRxiv.Yu, S., Gu, C., Huang, K., & Li, P. (2024). Predicting the next sentence (not word) in large language models: What model-brain alignment tells us about discourse comprehension. Science Advances, 10(21).Bavaresco, A., Kloots, M. D. H., Pezzelle, S., & Fernández, R. (2024). Vision-Language Models Align with Human Neural Representations in Concept Processing. arXiv.Wu, Z., Yu, X. V., Yogatama, D., Lu, J., & Kim, Y. (2024). The Semantic Hub Hypothesis: Language Models Share Semantic Representations Across Languages and Modalities. arXiv.Goldstein, A., Wang, H., Niekerken, L., Schain, M., Zada, Z., Aubrey, B., Sheffer, T., Nastase, S. A., Gazula, H., Singh, A., Rao, A., Choe, G., Kim, C., Doyle, W., Friedman, D., Devore, S., Dugan, P., Hassidim, A., Brenner, M., … Hasson, U. (2025). A unified acoustic-to-speech-to-language embedding space captures the neural basis of natural language processing in everyday conversations. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(5), 1041-1055.Gao, C., Ma, Z., Chen, J., Li, P., Huang, S., & Li, J. (2025). Increasing alignment of large language models with language processing in the human brain. Nature Computational Science, 5(11), 1080-1090.Zada, Z., Nastase, S. A., Li, J., & Hasson, U. (2025). Brains and language models converge on a shared conceptual space across different languages. arXiv.Ryskina, M., Tuckute, G., Fung, A., Malkin, A., & Fedorenko, E. (2025). Language models align with brain regions that represent concepts across modalities. arXiv.Xu, N., Zhang, Q., Du, C., Luo, Q., Qiu, X., Huang, X., & Zhang, M. (2025). Revealing emergent human-like conceptual representations from language prediction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(44).Lévy, J., Zhang, M., Pinet, S., Rapin, J., Banville, H., d'Ascoli, S., & King, J.-R. (2025). Brain-to-Text Decoding: A Non-invasive Approach via Typing. arXiv.Bhattacharjee, A., Zada, Z., Wang, H., Aubrey, B., Doyle, W., Dugan, P., Friedman, D., Devinsky, O., Flinker, A., Ramadge, P. J., Hasson, U., Goldstein, A., & Nastase, S. A. (2025). Aligning brains into a shared space improves their alignment with large language models. Nature Computational Science, 6(2), 169-178.Murphy, A. (2025). Viability of using LLMs as models of human language processing. Nature Computational Science, 6(2), 119-120.Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193-222.Kastner, S., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1998). Mechanisms of Directed Attention in the Human Extrastriate Cortex as Revealed by Functional MRI. Science, 282(5386), 108-111.Treue, S., & Trujillo, J. C. M. (1999). Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature, 399(6736), 575-579.McAdams, C. J., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1999). Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19(1), 431-441.Reynolds, J. H., & Chelazzi, L. (2004). Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 611-647.Martinez-Trujillo, J. C., & Treue, S. (2004). Feature-Based Attention Increases the Selectivity of Population Responses in Primate Visual Cortex. Current Biology, 14(9), 744-751.Bichot, N. P., Rossi, A. F., & Desimone, R. (2005). Parallel and Serial Neural Mechanisms for Visual Search in Macaque Area V4. Science, 308(5721), 529-534.Womelsdorf, T., Anton-Erxleben, K., Pieper, F., & Treue, S. (2006). Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention. Nature Neuroscience, 9(9), 1156-1160.Maunsell, J. H. R., & Treue, S. (2006). Feature-based attention in visual cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(6), 317-322.Serences, J. T., & Boynton, G. M. (2007). Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation. Neuron, 55(2), 301-312.Liu, T., Larsson, J., & Carrasco, M. (2007). Feature-Based Attention Modulates Orientation-Selective Responses in Human Visual Cortex. Neuron, 55(2), 313-323.Reynolds, J. H., & Heeger, D. J. (2009). The Normalization Model of Attention. Neuron, 61(2), 168-185.Cohen, M. R., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2009). Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations. Nature Neuroscience, 12(12), 1594-1600.Peelen, M. V., Fei-Fei, L., & Kastner, S. (2009). Neural mechanisms of rapid natural scene categorization in human visual cortex. Nature, 460(7251), 94-97.Saproo, S., & Serences, J. T. (2010). Spatial Attention Improves the Quality of Population Codes in Human Visual Cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(2), 885-895.Jehee, J. F. M., Brady, D. K., & Tong, F. (2011). Attention Improves Encoding of Task-Relevant Features in the Human Visual Cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(22), 8210-8219.Sprague, T. C., & Serences, J. T. (2013). Attention modulates spatial priority maps in the human occipital, parietal and frontal cortices. Nature Neuroscience, 16(12), 1879-1887.Harel, A., Kravitz, D. J., & Baker, C. I. (2014). Task context impacts visual object processing differentially across the cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(10).Sprague, T. C., Saproo, S., & Serences, J. T. (2015). Visual attention mitigates information loss in small- and large-scale neural codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(4), 215-226.Ester, E. F., Sutterer, D. W., Serences, J. T., & Awh, E. (2016). Feature-Selective Attentional Modulations in Human Frontoparietal Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(31), 8188-8199.Nastase, S. A., Connolly, A. C., Oosterhof, N. N., Halchenko, Y. O., Guntupalli, J. S., Visconti di Oleggio Castello, M., Gors, J., Gobbini, M. I., & Haxby, J. V. (2017). Attention Selectively Reshapes the Geometry of Distributed Semantic Representation. Cerebral Cortex, 27(8), 4277-4291.Vaziri-Pashkam, M., & Xu, Y. (2017). Goal-Directed Visual Processing Differentially Impacts Human Ventral and Dorsal Visual Representations. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(36), 8767-8782.Bugatus, L., Weiner, K. S., & Grill-Spector, K. (2017). Task alters category representations in prefrontal but not high-level visual cortex. NeuroImage, 155, 437-449.Vo, V. A., Sprague, T. C., & Serences, J. T. (2017). Spatial Tuning Shifts Increase the Discriminability and Fidelity of Population Codes in Visual Cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(12), 3386-3401.Sprague, T. C., Itthipuripat, S., Vo, V. A., & Serences, J. T. (2018). Dissociable signatures of visual salience and behavioral relevance across attentional priority maps in human cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 119(6), 2153-2165.Foster, J. J., Thyer, W., Wennberg, J. W., & Awh, E. (2021). Covert Attention Increases the Gain of Stimulus-Evoked Population Codes. The Journal of Neuroscience, 41(8), 1802-1815.Goddard, E., Carlson, T. A., & Woolgar, A. (2022). Spatial and Feature-selective Attention Have Distinct, Interacting Effects on Population-level Tuning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 34(2), 290-312.Bracci, S., & Op de Beeck, H. P. (2023). Understanding Human Object Vision: A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Representations. Annual Review of Psychology, 74(1), 113-135.Taylor, J., & Xu, Y. (2024). Using fMRI to examine nonlinear mixed selectivity tuning to task and category in the human brain. Imaging Neuroscience, 2.Lerebourg, M., de Lange, F. P., & Peelen, M. V. (2024). Attentional guidance through object associations in visual cortex. Science Advances, 10(41).Henderson, M. M., Serences, J. T., & Rungratsameetaweemana, N. (2025). Dynamic categorization rules alter representations in human visual cortex. Nature Communications, 16(1).Chapman, A. F., Allouche, M., & Denison, R. N. (2025). Attention reshapes the representational geometry of a perceptual feature space. bioRxiv.Mur, M., Mitchell, D. J., Brüggemann, S., & Duncan, J. (2025). Stimulus effects dwarf task effects in human visual cortex. bioRxiv.You, Y.-Q., Li, S., Cheng, Y.-A., Li, Y., Kay, K., & Zhang, R.-Y. (2025). Attention Improves Population Codes by Warping Neural Manifolds in Human Visual Cortex. bioRxiv.Thayer, D. D., & Sprague, T. C. (2025). Attention Modulates Stimulus Representations in Neural Feature Dimension Maps. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 37(12), 2503-2524.Ramirez, L. D., Wang, F., & Ling, S. (2025). Attention Alters Population Spatial Frequency Tuning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 45(25), e0251252025.Zhou, Z., & Geng, J. (2025). Preparatory attentional templates in prefrontal and sensory cortex encode target-associated information. eLife, 14.Özkan, M., Chapman, A. F., & Störmer, V. S. (2025). Zooming In and Out: Selective Attention Modulates Color Signals in Early Visual Cortex for Narrow and Broad Ranges of Task-Relevant Features. The Journal of Neuroscience, 45(24), e2097242025.Poncet, M., Batziou, P., & Chakravarthi, R. (2025). Neural representations of visual categories are dynamically tailored to the discrimination required by the task. Cerebral Cortex, 35(8).Pedersini, C., Muukkonen, I., & Wikman, P. (2025). Attention modulates the neural geometry of auditory representations. bioRxiv.Printzlau, F. A. B., Bulatova, O., Mack, M. L., & Fukuda, K. (2026). Task goals dynamically reconfigure neural working memory representations. bioRxiv.O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford University Press.Epstein, R., Harris, A., Stanley, D., & Kanwisher, N. (1999). The Parahippocampal Place Area. Neuron, 23(1), 115-125.Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(8), 4398-4403.Hartley, T., Maguire, E. A., Spiers, H. J., & Burgess, N. (2003). The Well-Worn Route and the Path Less Traveled. Neuron, 37(5), 877-888.Spiers, H. J., & Maguire, E. A. (2006). Thoughts, behaviour, and brain dynamics during navigation in the real world. NeuroImage, 31(4), 1826-1840.Doeller, C. F., Barry, C., & Burgess, N. (2010). Evidence for grid cells in a human memory network. Nature, 463(7281), 657-661.Gramann, K., Gwin, J. T., Ferris, D. P., Oie, K., Jung, T.-P., Lin, C.-T., Liao, L.-D., & Makeig, S. (2011). Cognition in action: imaging brain/body dynamics in mobile humans. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 22(6).Epstein, R. A., & Vass, L. K. (2014). Neural systems for landmark-based wayfinding in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1635), 20120533.Hasson, U., Chen, J., & Honey, C. J. (2015). Hierarchical process memory: memory as an integral component of information processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 304-313.Julian, J. B., Ryan, J., Hamilton, R. H., & Epstein, R. A. (2016). The Occipital Place Area Is Causally Involved in Representing Environmental Boundaries during Navigation. Current Biology, 26(8), 1104-1109.Schuck, N. W., Cai, M. B., Wilson, R. C., & Niv, Y. (2016). Human Orbitofrontal Cortex Represents a Cognitive Map of State Space. Neuron, 91(6), 1402-1412.Constantinescu, A. O., O’Reilly, J. X., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2016). Organizing conceptual knowledge in humans with a gridlike code. Science, 352(6292), 1464-1468.Javadi, A.-H., Emo, B., Howard, L. R., Zisch, F. E., Yu, Y., Knight, R., Pinelo Silva, J., & Spiers, H. J. (2017). Hippocampal and prefrontal processing of network topology to simulate the future. Nature Communications, 8(1).Epstein, R. A., Patai, E. Z., Julian, J. B., & Spiers, H. J. (2017). The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond. Nature Neuroscience, 20(11), 1504-1513.M. Aghajan, Z., Schuette, P., Fields, T. A., Tran, M. E., Siddiqui, S. M., Hasulak, N. R., Tcheng, T. K., Eliashiv, D., Mankin, E. A., Stern, J., Fried, I., & Suthana, N. (2017). Theta Oscillations in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe during Real-World Ambulatory Movement. Current Biology, 27(24), 3743-3751.e3.Bellmund, J. L. S., Gärdenfors, P., Moser, E. I., & Doeller, C. F. (2018). Navigating cognition: Spatial codes for human thinking. Science, 362(6415).Nau, M., Navarro Schröder, T., Bellmund, J. L. S., & Doeller, C. F. (2018). Hexadirectional coding of visual space in human entorhinal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 21(2), 188-190.Coutrot, A., Silva, R., Manley, E., de Cothi, W., Sami, S., Bohbot, V. D., Wiener, J. M., Hölscher, C., Dalton, R. C., Hornberger, M., & Spiers, H. J. (2018). Global Determinants of Navigation Ability. Current Biology, 28(17), 2861-2866.e4.Boto, E., Holmes, N., Leggett, J., Roberts, G., Shah, V., Meyer, S. S., Muñoz, L. D., Mullinger, K. J., Tierney, T. M., Bestmann, S., Barnes, G. R., Bowtell, R., & Brookes, M. J. (2018). Moving magnetoencephalography towards real-world applications with a wearable system. Nature, 555(7698), 657-661.Schuck, N. W., & Niv, Y. (2019). Sequential replay of nonspatial task states in the human hippocampus. Science, 364(6447).Sonkusare, S., Breakspear, M., & Guo, C. (2019). Naturalistic Stimuli in Neuroscience: Critically Acclaimed. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(8), 699-714.Park, S. A., Miller, D. S., Nili, H., Ranganath, C., & Boorman, E. D. (2020). Map Making: Constructing, Combining, and Inferring on Abstract Cognitive Maps. Neuron, 107(6), 1226-1238.e8.Bottini, R., & Doeller, C. F. (2020). Knowledge Across Reference Frames: Cognitive Maps and Image Spaces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(8), 606-619.Nastase, S. A., Goldstein, A., & Hasson, U. (2020). Keep it real: rethinking the primacy of experimental control in cognitive neuroscience. NeuroImage, 222, 117254.Park, S. A., Miller, D. S., & Boorman, E. D. (2021). Inferences on a multidimensional social hierarchy use a grid-like code. Nature Neuroscience, 24(9), 1292-1301.Peer, M., Brunec, I. K., Newcombe, N. S., & Epstein, R. A. (2021). Structuring Knowledge with Cognitive Maps and Cognitive Graphs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(1), 37-54.Stangl, M., Topalovic, U., Inman, C. S., Hiller, S., Villaroman, D., Aghajan, Z. M., Christov-Moore, L., Hasulak, N. R., Rao, V. R., Halpern, C. H., Eliashiv, D., Fried, I., & Suthana, N. (2021). Boundary-anchored neural mechanisms of location-encoding for self and others. Nature, 589(7842), 420-425.Coutrot, A., Manley, E., Goodroe, S., Gahnstrom, C., Filomena, G., Yesiltepe, D., Dalton, R. C., Wiener, J. M., Hölscher, C., Hornberger, M., & Spiers, H. J. (2022). Entropy of city street networks linked to future spatial navigation ability. Nature, 604(7904), 104-110.Stangl, M., Maoz, S. L., & Suthana, N. (2023). Mobile cognition: imaging the human brain in the ‘real world’. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 24(6), 347-362.Wagner, I. C., Graichen, L. P., Todorova, B., Lüttig, A., Omer, D. B., Stangl, M., & Lamm, C. (2023). Entorhinal grid-like codes and time-locked network dynamics track others navigating through space. Nature Communications, 14(1).Spiers, H. J., Coutrot, A., & Hornberger, M. (2023). Explaining World‐Wide Variation in Navigation Ability from Millions of People: Citizen Science Project Sea Hero Quest. Topics in Cognitive Science, 15(1), 120-138.Huang, Q., Xiao, Z., Yu, Q., Luo, Y., Xu, J., Qu, Y., Dolan, R., Behrens, T., & Liu, Y. (2024). Replay-triggered brain-wide activation in humans. Nature Communications, 15(1).Lu, Z., Julian, J. B., Aguirre, G. K., & Epstein, R. A. (2025). A Neural Compass in the Human Brain during Naturalistic Virtual Navigation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 45(34), e1765242025.Seeber, M., Stangl, M., Vallejo Martelo, M., Topalovic, U., Hiller, S., Halpern, C. H., Langevin, J.-P., Rao, V. R., Fried, I., Eliashiv, D., & Suthana, N. (2025). Human neural dynamics of real-world and imagined navigation. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(4), 781-793.Veselic, S., Muller, T. H., Gutierrez, E., Behrens, T. E. J., Hunt, L. T., Butler, J. L., & Kennerley, S. W. (2025). A cognitive map for value-guided choice in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Cell, 188(12), 3259-3273.e22.O'Keefe, J. (2025). How the Hippocampal Cognitive Map Supports Flexible Navigation. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 48(1), 331-344.Qu, Y., Ou, J., Pang, L., Wu, S., Luo, Y., Behrens, T., & Liu, Y. (2026). Development of non-spatial grid-like neural codes tracks inference and intelligence. Cell, 189(10), 3091-3106.e15.Mark, S., Schwartenbeck, P., Hahamy, A., Samborska, V., Baram, A. B., & Behrens, T. E. (2026). Flexible neural representations of abstract structural knowledge in the human entorhinal cortex. eLife, 13.Kransberg, J., Sjøli Bråthen, A. C., Falch, E. S., Øverbye, K. E. Ø., Garrido, P. F., Fjell, A. M., Stangl, M., Wolbers, T., Sneve, M. H., & Walhovd, K. B. (2026). Failure to detect entorhinal grid-like signals in a passive navigation human fMRI study. Imaging Neuroscience, 4.Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review, 61(3), 183-193.Barlow, H. B. (1961). Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In W. A. Rosenblith (Ed.), Sensory communication (pp. 217-234). MIT Press.Marmarelis, P. Z., & Naka, K.-I. (1972). White-Noise Analysis of a Neuron Chain: An Application of the Wiener Theory. Science, 175(4027), 1276-1278.Barlow, H. B. (1972). Single Units and Sensation: A Neuron Doctrine for Perceptual Psychology?. Perception, 1(4), 371-394.Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. W. H. Freeman.Ogawa, S., Lee, T., Nayak, A. S., & Glynn, P. (1990). Oxygenation‐sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 14(1), 68-78.Ogawa, S., Lee, T. M., Kay, A. R., & Tank, D. W. (1990). Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87(24), 9868-9872.Belliveau, J. W., Kennedy, D. N., McKinstry, R. C., Buchbinder, B. R., Weisskoff, R. M., Cohen, M. S., Vevea, J. M., Brady, T. J., & Rosen, B. R. (1991). Functional Mapping of the Human Visual Cortex by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Science, 254(5032), 716-719.Kwong, K. K., Belliveau, J. W., Chesler, D. A., Goldberg, I. E., Weisskoff, R. M., Poncelet, B. P., Kennedy, D. N., Hoppel, B. E., Cohen, M. S., & Turner, R. (1992). Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89(12), 5675-5679.Ogawa, S., Tank, D. W., Menon, R., Ellermann, J. M., Kim, S. G., Merkle, H., & Ugurbil, K. (1992). Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89(13), 5951-5955.Bandettini, P. A., Wong, E. C., Hinks, R. S., Tikofsky, R. S., & Hyde, J. S. (1992). Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 25(2), 390-397.Bandettini, P. A., Jesmanowicz, A., Wong, E. C., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Processing strategies for time‐course data sets in functional mri of the human brain. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 30(2), 161-173.Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994). Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Human Brain Mapping, 2(4), 189-210.Boynton, G. M., Engel, S. A., Glover, G. H., & Heeger, D. J. (1996). Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16(13), 4207-4221.Buxton, R. B., Wong, E. C., & Frank, L. R. (1998). Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: The balloon model. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 39(6), 855-864.Friston, K. J., Josephs, O., Rees, G., & Turner, R. (1998). Nonlinear event‐related responses in fMRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 39(1), 41-52.Pouget, A., Dayan, P., & Zemel, R. (2000). Information processing with population codes. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1(2), 125-132.Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 412(6843), 150-157.Heeger, D. J., & Ress, D. (2002). What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(2), 142-151.Hsu, A., Borst, A., & Theunissen, F. E. (2004). Quantifying variability in neural responses and its application for the validation of model predictions. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 15(2), 91-109.Kriegeskorte, N. (2008). Representational similarity analysis – connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience.Logothetis, N. K. (2008). What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature, 453(7197), 869-878.Mur, M., Bandettini, P. A., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2009). Revealing representational content with pattern-information fMRI—an introductory guide. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(1), 101-109.Fischl, B. (2012). FreeSurfer. NeuroImage, 62(2), 774-781.Glasser, M. F., Sotiropoulos, S. N., Wilson, J. A., Coalson, T. S., Fischl, B., Andersson, J. L., Xu, J., Jbabdi, S., Webster, M., Polimeni, J. R., Van Essen, D. C., & Jenkinson, M. (2013). The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. NeuroImage, 80, 105-124.Kay, K. N., Rokem, A., Winawer, J., Dougherty, R. F., & Wandell, B. A. (2013). GLMdenoise: a fast, automated technique for denoising task-based fMRI data. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7.Nili, H., Wingfield, C., Walther, A., Su, L., Marslen-Wilson, W., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2014). A Toolbox for Representational Similarity Analysis. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(4), e1003553.Yamins, D. L. K., Hong, H., Cadieu, C. F., Solomon, E. A., Seibert, D., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2014). Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8619-8624.Abraham, A., Pedregosa, F., Eickenberg, M., Gervais, P., Mueller, A., Kossaifi, J., Gramfort, A., Thirion, B., & Varoquaux, G. (2014). Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 8.Naselaris, T., & Kay, K. N. (2015). Resolving Ambiguities of MVPA Using Explicit Models of Representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 551-554.Kriegeskorte, N. (2015). Deep Neural Networks: A New Framework for Modeling Biological Vision and Brain Information Processing. Annual Review of Vision Science, 1(1), 417-446.Gorgolewski, K. J., Auer, T., Calhoun, V. D., Craddock, R. C., Das, S., Duff, E. P., Flandin, G., Ghosh, S. S., Glatard, T., Halchenko, Y. O., Handwerker, D. A., Hanke, M., Keator, D., Li, X., Michael, Z., Maumet, C., Nichols, B. N., Nichols, T. E., Pellman, J., … Poldrack, R. A. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3(1).Diedrichsen, J., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2017). Representational models: A common framework for understanding encoding, pattern-component, and representational-similarity analysis. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(4), e1005508.St-Yves, G., & Naselaris, T. (2018). The feature-weighted receptive field: an interpretable encoding model for complex feature spaces. NeuroImage, 180, 188-202.Kell, A. J. E., Yamins, D. L. K., Shook, E. N., Norman-Haignere, S. V., & McDermott, J. H. (2018). A Task-Optimized Neural Network Replicates Human Auditory Behavior, Predicts Brain Responses, and Reveals a Cortical Processing Hierarchy. Neuron, 98(3), 630-644.e16.Pinho, A. L., Amadon, A., Ruest, T., Fabre, M., Dohmatob, E., Denghien, I., Ginisty, C., Becuwe-Desmidt, S., Roger, S., Laurier, L., Joly-Testault, V., Médiouni-Cloarec, G., Doublé, C., Martins, B., Pinel, P., Eger, E., Varoquaux, G., Pallier, C., Dehaene, S., … Thirion, B. (2018). Individual Brain Charting, a high-resolution fMRI dataset for cognitive mapping. Scientific Data, 5(1).Esteban, O., Markiewicz, C. J., Blair, R. W., Moodie, C. A., Isik, A. I., Erramuzpe, A., Kent, J. D., Goncalves, M., DuPre, E., Snyder, M., Oya, H., Ghosh, S. S., Wright, J., Durnez, J., Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2019). fMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI. Nature Methods, 16(1), 111-116.Lage-Castellanos, A., Valente, G., Formisano, E., & De Martino, F. (2019). Methods for computing the maximum performance of computational models of fMRI responses. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(3), e1006397.Chang, N., Pyles, J. A., Marcus, A., Gupta, A., Tarr, M. J., & Aminoff, E. M. (2019). BOLD5000, a public fMRI dataset while viewing 5000 visual images. Scientific Data, 6(1).Schrimpf, M., Kubilius, J., Lee, M. J., Ratan Murty, N. A., Ajemian, R., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2020). Integrative Benchmarking to Advance Neurally Mechanistic Models of Human Intelligence. Neuron, 108(3), 413-423.Markiewicz, C. J., Gorgolewski, K. J., Feingold, F., Blair, R., Halchenko, Y. O., Miller, E., Hardcastle, N., Wexler, J., Esteban, O., Goncavles, M., Jwa, A., & Poldrack, R. (2021). The OpenNeuro resource for sharing of neuroscience data. eLife, 10.Cichy, R. M., Dwivedi, K., Lahner, B., Lascelles, A., Iamshchinina, P., Graumann, M., Andonian, A., Murty, N. A. R., Kay, K., Roig, G., & Oliva, A. (2021). The Algonauts Project 2021 Challenge: How the Human Brain Makes Sense of a World in Motion. arXiv.Nastase, S. A., Liu, Y.-F., Hillman, H., Zadbood, A., Hasenfratz, L., Keshavarzian, N., Chen, J., Honey, C. J., Yeshurun, Y., Regev, M., Nguyen, M., Chang, C. H. C., Baldassano, C., Lositsky, O., Simony, E., Chow, M. A., Leong, Y. C., Brooks, P. P., Micciche, E., … Hasson, U. (2021). The “Narratives” fMRI dataset for evaluating models of naturalistic language comprehension. Scientific Data, 8(1).Allen, E. J., St-Yves, G., Wu, Y., Breedlove, J. L., Prince, J. S., Dowdle, L. T., Nau, M., Caron, B., Pestilli, F., Charest, I., Hutchinson, J. B., Naselaris, T., & Kay, K. (2022). A massive 7T fMRI dataset to bridge cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Nature Neuroscience, 25(1), 116-126.de la Vega, A., Rocca, R., Blair, R. W., Markiewicz, C. J., Mentch, J., Kent, J. D., Herholz, P., Ghosh, S. S., Poldrack, R. A., & Yarkoni, T. (2022). Neuroscout, a unified platform for generalizable and reproducible fMRI research. eLife, 11.Hebart, M. N., Contier, O., Teichmann, L., Rockter, A. H., Zheng, C. Y., Kidder, A., Corriveau, A., Vaziri-Pashkam, M., & Baker, C. I. (2023). THINGS-data, a multimodal collection of large-scale datasets for investigating object representations in human brain and behavior. eLife, 12.Doerig, A., Sommers, R. P., Seeliger, K., Richards, B., Ismael, J., Lindsay, G. W., Kording, K. P., Konkle, T., van Gerven, M. A. J., Kriegeskorte, N., & Kietzmann, T. C. (2023). The neuroconnectionist research programme. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 24(7), 431-450.Gifford, A. T., Lahner, B., Saba-Sadiya, S., Vilas, M. G., Lascelles, A., Oliva, A., Kay, K., Roig, G., & Cichy, R. M. (2023). The Algonauts Project 2023 Challenge: How the Human Brain Makes Sense of Natural Scenes. arXiv.Gong, Z., Zhou, M., Dai, Y., Wen, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhen, Z. (2023). A large-scale fMRI dataset for the visual processing of naturalistic scenes. Scientific Data, 10(1).Lin, R., Naselaris, T., Kay, K., & Wehbe, L. (2024). Stacked regressions and structured variance partitioning for interpretable brain maps. NeuroImage, 298, 120772.Gifford, A. T., Bersch, D., St-Laurent, M., Pinsard, B., Boyle, J., Bellec, L., Oliva, A., Roig, G., & Cichy, R. M. (2024). The Algonauts Project 2025 Challenge: How the Human Brain Makes Sense of Multimodal Movies. arXiv.Binhuraib, T., Gao, R., & Ivanova, A. A. (2025). LITcoder: A General-Purpose Library for Building and Comparing Encoding Models. arXiv.Kamali, F., Suratgar, A. A., Menhaj, M., & Abbasi-Asl, R. (2025). Compression-enabled interpretability of voxelwise encoding models. PLOS Computational Biology, 21(2), e1012822.van den Bosch, J. J., Golan, T., Peters, B., Taylor, J., Shahbazi, M., Lin, B., Charest, I., Diedrichsen, J., Kriegeskorte, N., Mur, M., & Schütt, H. H. (2025). A Python Toolbox for Representational Similarity Analysis. eLife.St-Laurent, M., Pinsard, B., Contier, O., DuPre, E., Seeliger, K., Borghesani, V., Boyle, J. A., Bellec, L., & Hebart, M. N. (2025). CNeuroMod-THINGS, a densely-sampled fMRI dataset for visual neuroscience. arXiv.Morgenroth, E., Moia, S., Vilaclara, L., Fournier, R., Muszynski, M., Ploumitsakou, M., Almató-Bellavista, M., Vuilleumier, P., & Van De Ville, D. (2025). Emo-FilM: A multimodal dataset for affective neuroscience using naturalistic stimuli. Scientific Data, 12(1).Jung, H., Amini, M., Hunt, B. J., Murphy, E. I., Sadil, P., Halchenko, Y. O., Petre, B., Miao, Z., Kragel, P. A., Han, X., Heilicher, M. O., Sun, M., Collins, O. G., Lindquist, M. A., & Wager, T. D. (2025). Spacetop: A multimodal fMRI dataset unifying naturalistic processes with a rich array of experimental tasks. Scientific Data, 12(1).Goncalves, M., Moser, J., Madison, T. J., McCollum, R., Lundquist, J. T., Fayzullobekova, B., Hadera, L., Pham, H. H. N., Moore, L. A., Houghton, A., Conan, G., Styner, M. A., Alexopoulos, D., Smyser, C. D., Stoyell, S. M., Koirala, S., Nelson, S. M., Weldon, K. B., Lee, E., … Fair, D. A. (2025). fMRIPrep Lifespan: Extending A Robust Pipeline for Functional MRI Preprocessing to Developmental Neuroimaging. bioRxiv.Gallant, J. L., & Garner, W. R. (1988). Some effects of distance and structure on conjunction errors. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26(4), 323-326.Gallant, J. L., Braun, J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1993). Selectivity for Polar, Hyperbolic, and Cartesian Gratings in Macaque Visual Cortex. Science, 259(5091), 100-103.Connor, C. E., Gallant, J. L., Preddie, D. C., & Van Essen, D. C. (1996). Responses in area V4 depend on the spatial relationship between stimulus and attention. Journal of Neurophysiology, 75(3), 1306-1308.Gallant, J. L., Connor, C. E., Rakshit, S., Lewis, J. W., & Van Essen, D. C. (1996). Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in area V4 of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76(4), 2718-2739.Connor, C. E., Preddie, D. C., Gallant, J. L., & Van Essen, D. C. (1997). Spatial Attention Effects in Macaque Area V4. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(9), 3201-3214.Gallant, J. L., Connor, C. E., & Van Essen, D. C. (1998). Neural activity in areas V1, V2 and V4 during free viewing of natural scenes compared to controlled viewing. NeuroReport, 9(1), 85-89.Mazer, J. A., & Gallant, J. L. (2000). Object recognition: Seeing us seeing shapes. Current Biology, 10(18), R668-R670.Gallant, J. L., Shoup, R. E., & Mazer, J. A. (2000). A Human Extrastriate Area Functionally Homologous to Macaque V4. Neuron, 27(2), 227-235.★ GallantVinje, W. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2000). Sparse Coding and Decorrelation in Primary Visual Cortex During Natural Vision. Science, 287(5456), 1273-1276.Theunissen, F. E., David, S. V., Singh, N. C., Hsu, A., Vinje, W. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2001). Estimating spatio-temporal receptive fields of auditory and visual neurons from their responses to natural stimuli. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 12(3), 289-316.Mazer, J. A., Vinje, W. E., McDermott, J., Schiller, P. H., & Gallant, J. L. (2002). Spatial frequency and orientation tuning dynamics in area V1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(3), 1645-1650.Vinje, W. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2002). Natural Stimulation of the Nonclassical Receptive Field Increases Information Transmission Efficiency in V1. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22(7), 2904-2915.David, S. V., Vinje, W. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2004). Natural Stimulus Statistics Alter the Receptive Field Structure of V1 Neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24(31), 6991-7006.Hansen, K. A., David, S. V., & Gallant, J. L. (2004). Parametric reverse correlation reveals spatial linearity of retinotopic human V1 BOLD response. NeuroImage, 23(1), 233-241.★ HansenDavid, S. V., & Gallant, J. L. (2005). Predicting neuronal responses during natural vision. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 16(2-3), 239-260.David, S. V., Hayden, B. Y., & Gallant, J. L. (2006). Spectral Receptive Field Properties Explain Shape Selectivity in Area V4. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96(6), 3492-3505.Wu, M. C. K., David, S. V., & Gallant, J. L. (2006). Complete functional characterization of sensory neurons by system identification. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29(1), 477-505.★ WuHansen, K. A., Kay, K. N., & Gallant, J. L. (2007). Topographic Organization in and near Human Visual Area V4. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(44), 11896-11911.★ HansenVu, V. Q., Yu, B., Naselaris, T., Kay, K., Gallant, J. L., & Ravikumar, P. (2008). Nonparametric sparse hierarchical models describe V1 fMRI responses to natural images. Neural Information Processing Systems.Willmore, B., Prenger, R. J., Wu, M. C. K., & Gallant, J. L. (2008). The Berkeley Wavelet Transform: A Biologically Inspired Orthogonal Wavelet Transform. Neural Computation, 20(6), 1537-1564.Kay, K. N., Naselaris, T., Prenger, R. J., & Gallant, J. L. (2008). Identifying natural images from human brain activity. Nature, 452(7185), 352-355.★ KayKay, K. N., David, S. V., Prenger, R. J., Hansen, K. A., & Gallant, J. L. (2008). Modeling low‐frequency fluctuation and hemodynamic response timecourse in event‐related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 29(2), 142-156.David, S. V., Hayden, B. Y., Mazer, J. A., & Gallant, J. L. (2008). Attention to Stimulus Features Shifts Spectral Tuning of V4 Neurons during Natural Vision. Neuron, 59(3), 509-521.Gallant, J., Naselaris, T., Prenger, R., Kay, K., Stansbury, D., Oliver, M., Vu, A., & Nishimoto, S. (2009). Bayesian Reconstruction of Perceptual Experiences from Human Brain Activity. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.Naselaris, T., Prenger, R. J., Kay, K. N., Oliver, M., & Gallant, J. L. (2009). Bayesian Reconstruction of Natural Images from Human Brain Activity. Neuron, 63(6), 902-915.★ NaselarisKay, K. N., & Gallant, J. L. (2009). I can see what you see. Nature Neuroscience, 12(3), 245-245.Willmore, B. D. B., Prenger, R. J., & Gallant, J. L. (2010). Neural Representation of Natural Images in Visual Area V2. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(6), 2102-2114.Nishimoto, S., Vu, A. T., Naselaris, T., Benjamini, Y., Yu, B., & Gallant, J. L. (2011). Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies. Current Biology, 21(19), 1641-1646.★ NishimotoNaselaris, T., Kay, K. N., Nishimoto, S., & Gallant, J. L. (2011). Encoding and decoding in fMRI. NeuroImage, 56(2), 400-410.★ NaselarisVu, V. Q., Ravikumar, P., Naselaris, T., Kay, K. N., Gallant, J. L., & Yu, B. (2011). Encoding and decoding V1 fMRI responses to natural images with sparse nonparametric models. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 5(2B).Gallant, J. L., Nishimoto, S., Naselaris, T., & Wu, M. C. K. (2011). System Identification, Encoding Models, and Decoding Models: A Powerful New Approach to fMRI Research. Visual Population Codes.Huth, A. G., Nishimoto, S., Vu, A. T., & Gallant, J. L. (2012). A Continuous Semantic Space Describes the Representation of Thousands of Object and Action Categories across the Human Brain. Neuron, 76(6), 1210-1224.★ HuthNaselaris, T., Stansbury, D. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2012). Cortical representation of animate and inanimate objects in complex natural scenes. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 106(5-6), 239-249.★ NaselarisStansbury, D. E., Naselaris, T., & Gallant, J. L. (2013). Natural Scene Statistics Account for the Representation of Scene Categories in Human Visual Cortex. Neuron, 79(5), 1025-1034.★ StansburyÇukur, T., Huth, A. G., Nishimoto, S., & Gallant, J. L. (2013). Functional Subdomains within Human FFA. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(42), 16748-16766.Çukur, T., Nishimoto, S., Huth, A. G., & Gallant, J. L. (2013). Attention during natural vision warps semantic representation across the human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 16(6), 763-770.★ ÇukurStansbury, D. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2014). A Statistical Modeling Framework for Investigating Visual Scene Processing in the Human Brain. Scene Vision.Agrawal, P., Stansbury, D., Malik, J., & Gallant, J. L. (2014). Pixels to Voxels: Modeling Visual Representation in the Human Brain. arXiv.Naselaris, T., Olman, C. A., Stansbury, D. E., Ugurbil, K., & Gallant, J. L. (2015). A voxel-wise encoding model for early visual areas decodes mental images of remembered scenes. NeuroImage, 105, 215-228.★ NaselarisBilenko, N. Y., & Gallant, J. L. (2015). Pyrcca: regularized kernel canonical correlation analysis in Python and its applications to neuroimaging. arXiv.Vu, A. T., & Gallant, J. L. (2015). Using a novel source-localized phase regressor technique for evaluation of the vascular contribution to semantic category area localization in BOLD fMRI. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9.Huth, A. G., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2015). PrAGMATiC: a Probabilistic and Generative Model of Areas Tiling the Cortex. arXiv.Lescroart, M. D., Stansbury, D. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2015). Fourier power, subjective distance, and object categories all provide plausible models of BOLD responses in scene-selective visual areas. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 9.★ LescroartGao, J. S., Huth, A. G., Lescroart, M. D., & Gallant, J. L. (2015). Pycortex: an interactive surface visualizer for fMRI. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 9.★ GaoHuth, A. G., de Heer, W. A., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2016). Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature, 532(7600), 453-458.★ HuthÇukur, T., Huth, A. G., Nishimoto, S., & Gallant, J. L. (2016). Functional Subdomains within Scene-Selective Cortex: Parahippocampal Place Area, Retrosplenial Complex, and Occipital Place Area. The Journal of Neuroscience, 36(40), 10257-10273.Huth, A. G., Lee, T., Nishimoto, S., Bilenko, N. Y., Vu, A. T., & Gallant, J. L. (2016). Decoding the Semantic Content of Natural Movies from Human Brain Activity. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 10.★ HuthBilenko, N. Y., & Gallant, J. L. (2016). Pyrcca: Regularized Kernel Canonical Correlation Analysis in Python and Its Applications to Neuroimaging. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 10.de Heer, W. A., Huth, A. G., Griffiths, T. L., Gallant, J. L., & Theunissen, F. E. (2017). The Hierarchical Cortical Organization of Human Speech Processing. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(27), 6539-6557.★ de HeerO. Nunez-Elizalde, A., S. Gao, J., Zhang, T., & L. Gallant, J. (2018). cottoncandy: scientific python package for easy cloud storage. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(28), 890.Deniz, F., Nunez-Elizalde, A. O., Huth, A. G., & Gallant, J. L. (2019). The Representation of Semantic Information Across Human Cerebral Cortex During Listening Versus Reading Is Invariant to Stimulus Modality. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(39), 7722-7736.★ DenizLescroart, M. D., & Gallant, J. L. (2019). Human Scene-Selective Areas Represent 3D Configurations of Surfaces. Neuron, 101(1), 178-192.e7.★ LescroartNunez-Elizalde, A. O., Huth, A. G., & Gallant, J. L. (2019). Voxelwise encoding models with non-spherical multivariate normal priors. NeuroImage, 197, 482-492.★ Nunez-ElizaldeSlivkoff, S., & Gallant, J. L. (2020). Design of Complex Experiments Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming. arXiv.Gallant, J. L., & Popham, S. F. (2020). Semantic Representation in the Human Brain under Rich, Naturalistic Conditions. The Cognitive Neurosciences.Slivkoff, S., & Gallant, J. L. (2021). Design of complex neuroscience experiments using mixed-integer linear programming. Neuron, 109(9), 1433-1448.Popham, S. F., Huth, A. G., Bilenko, N. Y., Deniz, F., Gao, J. S., Nunez-Elizalde, A. O., & Gallant, J. L. (2021). Visual and linguistic semantic representations are aligned at the border of human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 24(11), 1628-1636.★ PophamZhang, T., Gao, J. S., Çukur, T., & Gallant, J. L. (2021). Voxel-Based State Space Modeling Recovers Task-Related Cognitive States in Naturalistic fMRI Experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14.Çelik, E., Keles, U., Kiremitçi, İ., Gallant, J. L., & Çukur, T. (2021). Cortical networks of dynamic scene category representation in the human brain. Cortex, 143, 127-147.Shahdloo, M., Çelik, E., Urgen, B. A., Gallant, J. L., & Çukur, T. (2022). Task-Dependent Warping of Semantic Representations during Search for Visual Action Categories. The Journal of Neuroscience, 42(35), 6782-6799.Dupré la Tour, T., Eickenberg, M., Nunez-Elizalde, A. O., & Gallant, J. L. (2022). Feature-space selection with banded ridge regression. NeuroImage, 264, 119728.★ Dupré la TourMeschke, E. X., Castello, M. V. D. O., Tour, T. D. L., & Gallant, J. L. (2023). Model connectivity: leveraging the power of encoding models to overcome the limitations of functional connectivity. bioRxiv.Deniz, F., Tseng, C., Wehbe, L., Dupré la Tour, T., & Gallant, J. L. (2023). Semantic Representations during Language Comprehension Are Affected by Context. The Journal of Neuroscience, 43(17), 3144-3158.Gong, X. L., Huth, A. G., Deniz, F., Johnson, K., Gallant, J. L., & Theunissen, F. E. (2023). Phonemic segmentation of narrative speech in human cerebral cortex. Nature Communications, 14(1).Dupré la Tour, T., Visconti di Oleggio Castello, M., & Gallant, J. L. (2024). The Voxelwise Modeling framework: a tutorial introduction to fitting encoding models to fMRI data. PsyArXiv.Abdel-Ghaffar, S. A., Huth, A. G., Lescroart, M. D., Stansbury, D., Gallant, J. L., & Bishop, S. J. (2024). Occipital-temporal cortical tuning to semantic and affective features of natural images predicts associated behavioral responses. Nature Communications, 15(1).Chen, C., Dupré la Tour, T., Gallant, J. L., Klein, D., & Deniz, F. (2024). The cortical representation of language timescales is shared between reading and listening. Communications Biology, 7(1).Visconti di Oleggio Castello, M., Deniz, F., Dupré la Tour, T., & Gallant, J. L. (2025). Encoding models in functional magnetic resonance imaging: the Voxelwise Encoding Model framework. PsyArXiv.Zhang, T., Meschke, E. X., & Gallant, J. (2025). A map of the cortical functional network mediating naturalistic navigation. bioRxiv.Visconti di Oleggio Castello, M., Dupré la Tour, T., & Gallant, J. L. (2025). Individual differences shape conceptual representation in the brain. bioRxiv.Zeng, A., & Gallant, J. (2025). Disentangling Superpositions: Interpretable Brain Encoding Model with Sparse Concept Atoms. bioRxiv.Dupré la Tour, T., Visconti di Oleggio Castello, M., & Gallant, J. L. (2025). The Voxelwise Encoding Model framework: A tutorial introduction to fitting encoding models to fMRI data. Imaging Neuroscience, 3.Chen, C., Gong, X. L., Tseng, C., Klein, D. L., Gallant, J. L., & Deniz, F. (2026). Bilingual language processing relies on shared semantic representations that are modulated by each language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 123(9).Chen, C., Gong, X. L., Deniz, F., Klein, D. L., & Gallant, J. L. (2026). Representations of semantic relations in the human cerebral cortex. bioRxiv.Zhang, T., & Gallant, J. L. (2026). Visual semantic tuning across the cortex shifts between tasks. bioRxiv.